Probiotics (Total CFU)
Of 4,150 on-market probiotics (total cfu) products in the January 2026 DSLD dump, the median declared dose is 30,000 CFU.
4,150
on-market products
30,000 CFU
median dose
—
below RDA
—
above UL
Advertisement
Form share
Of 0 products with an identifiable primary form, here is the share held by each form of Probiotics (Total CFU) on the market today.
| Form | Quality tier | n | Share |
|---|
Dose distribution
Deciles of declared dose per serving (CFU), among 788 products with a disclosed amount.
- 88.2% of products fall below the fairy-dust threshold (200000000 CFU, 20% of the studied low dose).
- 71.0% of products don't disclose an amount because Probiotics (Total CFU) is declared inside a proprietary blend.
By dosage form
By target group
Top brands
Forms explained
Reference values
- RDA (adult): not established — Not a DRI nutrient category; no RDA exists.
- Tolerable Upper Intake Level (adult): not established — Not established. NIH ODS: clinical trials have used doses from roughly 10^7 to 10^11 CFU/day across strains/indications with no established outer ceiling for healthy adults; safety is more a function of strain and host immune status (e.g. caution in immunocompromised individuals) than total CFU count.
- Studied clinical dose range: 1000000000–100000000000 CFU
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, "Probiotics - Health Professional Fact Sheet": successful clinical outcomes reported across roughly 10^7-10^11 CFU/day depending on strain and indication, with no single dose established as effective/necessary across probiotics generally.
- Note: Probiotics deliberately do NOT use the compound+forms model applied elsewhere: individual DSLD ingredient rows are species/strain names, aggregated here under one "probiotics" compound by total CFU. Genus/species-level quality tiering is NOT applied -- probiotic efficacy evidence is strain-specific (e.g. a named, clinically- studied strain like GG, BB-12, HN019, DSM 17938 vs. an uncharacterized isolate of the same species), not a property of the genus or even species as a whole; a genus-level tier would misrepresent the science. forms.yaml has no entries for this compound. Alias list includes both pre- and post-2020 Lactobacillus genus-split names (the 2020 taxonomic split created 25 new genera, e.g. Lacticaseibacillus, Lactiplantibacillus) so older and newer label conventions for the same organism aren't fragmented into different rows.